You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Paradigms and problems: The practice of social science in natural resource management
Author: Patterson, Michael E.; Williams, Daniel R.
Source: Society and Natural Resources. 11: 279-295.
Description: Increasingly, natural resource management is seeing calls for new paradigms. These calls pose challenges that have implications not only for planning and management, but also for the practice of science. As a consequence, the profession needs to deepen its understanding of the nature of science by exploring recent advances in the philosophy of science. We believe that one of the problems inhibiting a better understanding of science is a strongly ingrained belief that science is about methodology. This perspective is reflected in Hetherington, Daniel, and Brown's (1994) recent criticism of Bengston's (1994) methodological pluralism. To initiate discussions that may help bring about a reconsideration of the nature of science, we offer a two-part definition of science. The first portrays science as a systematic endeavor that shares a common process without mandating a common methodology. The second part is an attempt to highlight and promote an exploration of the normative structure that underlies science.
Keywords: epistemology, ontology, paradigms, philosophy of science, pluralism, relativism, worldview
View or Print this Publication (1.2 MB)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
Patterson, Michael E.; Williams, Daniel R. 1998. Paradigms and problems: The practice of social science in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources. 11: 279-295.
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility