Title: The wildfire experiment (WIFE): observations with airborne remote sensors
Author: Radke, L.F.; Clark, T.L.; Coen, J.L.; Walther, C.A.; Lockwood, R.N.; Riggan, P.J.; Brass, J.A.; Higgins, R.G.
Source: Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 26(5): 406-417
Description: Airborne remote sensors have long been a cornerstone of wildland fire research, and recently three-dimensional fire behaviour models fully coupled to the atmosphere have begun to show a convincing level of verisimilitude. The WildFire Experiment (WiFE) attempted the marriage of airborne remote sensors, multi-sensor observations together with fire model development and verification. An interagency array of sensors was mounted on the research Lockheed C-130 aircraft of the National Science Foundation and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) for this project. Many of our observational goals were reached in a single fire season in this preliminary proof of concept program. In 1998, we observed several large fires within about 1500 Ian of our base in Colorado (~3 hours flying time). In mission planning; assisted by the National Fire Information System, we sought extreme and complex fire behaviour and were able to locate S0i1U3 lm'ge high intensity wildfires that were superbly imaged by the sensor payload.
View and Print this Publication (2.09 MB)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly
which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility
Radke, L.F.; Clark, T.L.; Coen, J.L.; Walther, C.A.; Lockwood, R.N.; Riggan, P.J.; Brass, J.A.; Higgins, R.G. 2000. The wildfire experiment (WIFE): observations with airborne remote sensors. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 26(5): 406-417.