You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Comments in defense of symposia proceedings: Response to Bart and Anderson
Author: Finch, Deborah M.; Ward, A. Lorin; Hamre, R. H.
Source: Wildlife Society Bulletin. 10(2): 181-183.
Description: A recent "Opinion" in the Wildlife Society Bulletin (Bart and Anderson 1981) made a case against publishing symposia proceedings because (1) papers of non-refereed symposia often lack credibility and, therefore, harm both the authors and the profession, (2) proceedings are not readily retrievable, and (3) some symposium reports are not appropriate for publication. Although some proceedings may be disorganized and include poorly written papers, Bart and Anderson's generalization unnecessarily downgrades what can be an excellent tool for technology transfer. In this rebuttal opinion we give examples of outstanding symposia and proceedings and discuss advantages to symposia not mentioned by Bart and Anderson.
Keywords: symposia proceedings, technology transfer
View or Print this Publication (132 KB)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
Finch, Deborah M.; Ward, A. Lorin; Hamre, R. H. 1982. Comments in defense of symposia proceedings: Response to Bart and Anderson. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 10(2): 181-183.
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility